𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝘀.

Starting in 2026, every Meta employee gets evaluated on "AI-driven impact." Not potential. Actual results.

Microsoft, Google, Amazon? Already doing this.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁:

We still hire for communication, problem-solving, and leadership. These matter. But the game has changed.

The best communicator today uses AI to sharpen their message in seconds.

The best analyst uses AI to accelerate insight generation.

The work changed. Interviews should too.

At Informed Decisions, we help clients assess AI fluency as a tangible skill. Not hype. Actual behavior. How candidates combine human judgment with AI to solve problems and deliver results.

If AI redefines performance, it must redefine how you assess talent.

What's your take-should AI fluency be standard in every interview process?