Plot twist: 66% of candidates love being asked about their hobbies.
They're wrong to love it.

Here's what last week's survey really revealed about this seemingly harmless question:
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐:
66% view it positively (love showing personality + good ice-breaker)
35% see it as problematic (unprofessional + discriminatory)
๐ข๐๐ฟ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ Informed Decisions
While we understand why some interviewers ask about hobbies, we recommend avoiding this question.
Here's why:
Yes, there are seemingly valid reasons professionals still ask:
- It offers a fuller picture of candidates beyond work experience
- It can reveal extraordinary achievements, stamina, or endurance
- It might show passion and dedication that indicates growth potential
๐๐๐ ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ'๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ต ๐๐ฟ๐๐๐ต ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐:
- ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐: Hobbies often reflect opportunity, not just talent.
A Pew Research study shows 84% of high-income adults engage in hobbies vs. 47% of low-income adults.
Are we inadvertently favoring privilege?
- ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ณ๐ถ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ฎ๐: That former quarterback? Not automatically a team player.
And those without team sports?
Not automatically lone wolves.
Don't let false assumptions narrow your talent pool.
It's your job to assess relevant skills during the interview process.
- ๐ฆ๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ฎ๐: We're naturally drawn to people with similar hobbies.
You might subconsciously favor the candidate who shares your passion for rock climbing.
But diversity drives innovation.
In talent assessment, there's always a tradeoff between more information and potential bias. As professionals, it's our responsibility to focus on skills and potential.