Modern hiring teams rely on interview intelligence platforms and interview software to bring structure, clarity, and fairness into their decision making. Two well-known solutions in the category are BrightHire and Informed Decisions. Both support interviewers throughout the hiring process, but the way they help teams improve interview quality is different.
This comparison outlines the focus areas, strengths, and value of each platform so organizations can choose the solution that best aligns with their goals for accuracy, fairness, and hiring performance.
BrightHire supports structured interviews and provides AI generated questions and automated notes to help interviewers stay organized. This creates a consistent experience and reduces manual work during interviews.
Informed Decisions uses interview content and scoring frameworks developed by IO psychologists. The platform provides:
Customized questions tailored to the organization and position
Clear definitions of each skill
Scoring rubrics that outline what strong answers look like
This allows teams to run highly structured, skills-based interviews that align with organizational standards and evaluation criteria.
Takeaway: Both platforms offer structure. Informed Decisions emphasizes expert designed, customized content and rigorous scoring to strengthen predictive accuracy.
BrightHire surfaces interviewer behaviors through recordings, transcripts, and AI generated notes. These tools support reflection, knowledge sharing, and awareness of interview habits. BrightHire also provides aggregated data about speaking ratio, late starts, and interview quality scores.
Informed Decisions is designed to actively improve interviewer performance. The platform provides:
Actionable feedback after every interview
Insight into positive interviewing behaviors and bias patterns
Monitoring and visualization of improvement over time
Individual and team level insights on quality of hire
This approach focuses on developing predictable, highly effective interviewers throughout the organization.
Takeaway: BrightHire offers valuable visibility. Informed Decisions adds structured, ongoing development supported by behavioral science.
BrightHire concentrates on elevating the interview experience with strong visibility and collaboration capabilities.
Informed Decisions connects interview data to post hire performance and retention. This allows organizations to see:
Which skills actually predict success
Which interviewers are most accurate
Which interview questions need to be adjusted
The platform adapts over time using real performance data to refine fit score models for better future accuracy.
Takeaway: BrightHire enhances the interview itself. Informed Decisions extends the value into post hire outcomes and predictive learning.
BrightHire improves collaboration through searchable recordings, AI notes, and easy comparison of interview content across candidates.
Informed Decisions uses a structured decision matrix to organize data across the full hiring process. Teams see:
Overall fit scores for each candidate
Skill level comparisons
How interviewers aligned or differed in their evaluations
Clear areas of evaluation inconsistency
Easy side by side comparisons of finalists
Informed Decisions also limits the sharing of information from one interview to another in order to reduce bias, a choice that supports fairness and consistent skill based evaluation.
Takeaway: Both platforms improve decision making. Informed Decisions strengthens the process with structured evidence and built in bias reducing safeguards.
BrightHire’s pricing varies based on package and organization size. Public information suggests flexibility across usage tiers, but details typically require a conversation with their team.
Informed Decisions uses a position based pricing model:
Unlimited interviewers
Unlimited candidates
One annual price per role or role grouping
ATS integration included
This helps growing organizations scale interview volume without increasing cost per seat.
Takeaway: BrightHire uses customizable packages. Informed Decisions offers predictable cost for teams with many interviewers or high interview volume.
Both platforms include:
AI powered transcription
AI generated interview summaries
Tools that reduce note taking and help interviewers stay present
Informed Decisions adds skill based summaries and post interview candidate feedback summaries aligned with the scoring rubric used in the interview.
Both BrightHire and Informed Decisions meaningfully improve the interview process. The right choice depends on what your organization values most.
Choose BrightHire if your priority is:
AI notes that streamline documentation
Collaboration tools for interview visibility
Recording and playback capabilities
A simpler way to manage interview logistics
Choose Informed Decisions if your priority is:
IO psychologist developed questions, scoring rubrics, and skills based design
Continuous interviewer improvement and bias pattern insights
Structured decision making across the entire hiring process
Predictive insights that connect interviews to performance and retention
Reducing bias by limiting unnecessary information sharing
Scalable pricing with unlimited interviewers
Both solutions strengthen interviews. Informed Decisions is built for organizations that want deeper scientific rigor, stronger fairness outcomes, and measurable improvement in hiring accuracy over time.
| Feature | BrightHire | Informed Decisions |
|---|---|---|
| Interview structure | Structured interviews with AI generated questions | IO psychologist designed, customized questions for each role |
| Scoring framework | Basic consistency support | Built in scoring and skill level rubrics for every competency |
| AI transcription and summary | Yes | Yes, plus skill based summaries |
Interviewer development | Post interview feedback about a specific interview. Aggregated data on speaking ratio and late starts | Actionable feedback, bias pattern detection, improvement tracking |
| Bias reduction | General guidance | Bias monitoring, scoring calibration, limited info sharing to reduce bias |
| Post hire insights | Not a primary focus | Full linkage to performance and retention to refine predictions |
| Decision making tools | Searchable recordings, AI notes | Decision matrix with skill comparisons and alignment insights |
Candidate comparison | Supported via recordings and notes | Side by side skill comparison and fit score analysis |
| Pricing model | Custom quote required | Position based pricing with unlimited interviewers |
| Ideal for | Teams prioritizing efficiency and visibility | Teams prioritizing accuracy, fairness, and predictive improvement |