A week ago, we read a post from a lawyer interviewing at several firms.
She said she was asked the same question by multiple companies:
โ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฎ ๐น๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด?
For us at Informed Decisions, this question is a BIG NO NO
1. A candidateโs parents have zero predictive value.
Cristiano Ronaldoโs father was a municipal gardener battling alcoholism.
That didnโt predict that his son would become one of the greatest athletes of all time.
Use your interview time for skills, values, behaviors, motivations-not genealogy.
2. The โholistic evaluationโ illusion.
I often hear: โWe want to understand the whole person.โ
It sounds thoughtful-but youโre not getting that in 45 minutes.
Youโre getting noise. And with it, bias-not better data.
3. Structured evaluation is more predictive-every time.
Intuition feels powerful. But data says structured, job-relevant assessments win.
Childhood stories and family backgrounds? Thatโs when reliability drops and bias rises.
If we want fair, consistent, high-quality hiring, we need to focus on what actually predicts success.
๐ Skills.
๐ Behaviors.
๐ Evidence.
Signal-not noise.